The assertion that the engine is “not important” in the mystery of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 due to a missile damaging it, thereby causing the disappearance of the century, is a provocative claim that warrants careful examination.

While it is crucial to explore all possible scenarios in unraveling the mystery of MH370, the notion that a missile strike on the engine led to the aircraft’s disappearance raises several questions and challenges.

Firstly, the theory of a missile strike must be supported by credible evidence. Such an extraordinary claim requires substantial proof to be considered plausible. Without concrete evidence corroborating this theory, it remains speculative and subject to skepticism.

Secondly, even if a missile were to have damaged the engine, it is unlikely to be the sole factor contributing to the disappearance of the aircraft. Aviation incidents are typically multifaceted, with various factors, such as mechanical failures, human error, and environmental conditions, playing interconnected roles.

Thirdly, the absence of verifiable debris or wreckage consistent with a missile strike raises doubts about the validity of this hypothesis. The extensive search efforts conducted in the wake of MH370’s disappearance have yielded limited findings, further complicating the investigation and casting doubt on alternative theories.

Additionally, attributing the disappearance of MH370 solely to a missile strike overlooks the complexities of modern aviation systems and protocols designed to prevent such catastrophic events. Aircraft are equipped with redundant safety mechanisms and communication systems to mitigate risks and respond to emergencies effectively.

In conclusion, while exploring alternative theories is essential in the search for truth, the claim that the engine is “not important” in the MH370 mystery due to a missile strike requires rigorous scrutiny and substantiation. Without compelling evidence and a comprehensive understanding of the events leading to the aircraft’s disappearance, such assertions remain speculative and inconclusive.